High Commission of the United Kingdom in Islamabad
Address | Diplomatic Enclave Ramna 5 Islamabad Pakistan |
---|---|
Postal | PO Box 1122 |
Phone | local: international: |
Fax | local: international: |
visqry2. | |
Web site | http:/ |
Address | Diplomatic Enclave Ramna 5 Islamabad Pakistan |
---|---|
Postal | PO Box 1122 |
Phone | local: international: |
Fax | local: international: |
visqry2. | |
Web site | http:/ |
Comments on this High Commission
Thank You for your swift reply.
same status 'forwarded to islamabad oc' and its been 10 working days...and another fellow applicant she applied for husband on 13/03/2013 and her status remains same(thats 18working days). she rang gerrys and they informed her forwarded to islamabad oc' means its under process. (im not entirely convinced) seems delay for march applicants now. Almighty Lord of All Worlds is Greatest Planner!
http://www.immigrationboards.com/viewtopic.php?t=105527&postdays=0&postorder=desc&start=0
What other forum is there?
ive replied to ur msg on the other forum :)
will do.. ill let u knw as soon as i hear sumthing..
is their possibility that the Number of ECOs dealing with Settlement Backlog have been reduced?
Thus, causing delay in Status change on Gerrys website and with RFCs?
Good Luck Adam, have a nice journey keep us posted, insha Allah good news.
Mona keep checking ur online status I have all my hope that it will be updated after 12 BST
have a safe flight bro.. will u still use the forum while ur abroad?
Good luck for tomro see u guys when im back inshallah mona sister and seenan get there visa.
It should not matter but if you withdraw large sum of money it is better to explain what happened at that time as they doubt that you may had taken money from someone to increase your bank statement balance and eventually returned the money.
I think same happened in Neelam's sister case where they may have doubted the incoming money was to increase bank statement and if ECO is convinced that it was deception then they refuse under paragraphs of suitability or section 370A which is not good.
Post a comment on this page
We invite you to share your experiences with the British High Commission — obtaining visas and other services, locating the building, and so on. Your comments may be seen by the public, so please do not include private information.
This web site is not operated by the High Commission and your comments and questions will not necessarily be seen by its staff. Please note that this is not a forum for broad debate about the foreign policy of the United Kingdom, and such topics will be deleted.